Cal Wilson / October 17, 2022

” 65% of businesses surveyed anticipate a recession in the next six months, and 63% report having already been negatively impacted by inflation.”

The following article was shared by EBN on October 11th, 2022:

In the face of a recession, business owners avoid cutting salaries and benefits

In recent years, creating supportive environments and robust benefit packages for employees became table stakes. As the economy falters, employers are looking for new solutions to financial stability — but those solutions can’t come at the cost of employee loyalty.

According to Principal Financial’s 2022 Well-Being Index, 65% of businesses surveyed anticipate a recession in the next six months, and 63% report having already been negatively impacted by inflation. And yet, more employers have turned to increasing prices (64%) and reducing operating expenses (62%) than have reduced or stopped hiring (42%). In fact, 55% of businesses said they will not reduce salaries if hit with a recession, and 47% said they will not reduce benefits.

“Organizations have fought so hard for every hire, and employee loyalty is incredibly important right now — and probably always should have been,” says Amy Friedrich, president of U.S. insurance solutions at Principal. “Instead, they’re looking at other ways to cut costs.”

In her role, Friedrich is primarily focused on insurance solutions for small and mid-size operations, and is also responsible for Principal’s 1,200 affiliated financial professionals. As financial wellness has become of increased importance for both organizations and their workforce, she’s working to help businesses embrace income protection products, while building flexible benefit plans that provide vital support to employees in need.

Friedrich recently spoke with EBN about shifts in the market, boosting education and understanding of benefits for small- and mid-size business owners, and why a back-to-basics approach to benefits is helping organizations find stability in times of stress.

As we emerge from the pandemic and head straight into economic uncertainty, what are some of the concerns you’re hearing from business leaders? 

It’s a little bit of a back-to-basics story. Everybody wanted to talk to me about dental and vision and those buzzier benefits — and I get it, those are interesting to talk about. What the pandemic really brought into sharp focus for these business owners is the need for a group life policy or even a short-term disability policy. If you hadn’t done the basics with some of your life and disability coverages, your employees were really exposed. People want to offer their employees some kind of income protection if they have to be away from work, or something that would provide coverage in the scenario of the death of an employee. Going back to basics isn’t always an incredibly exciting story, but it’s a pretty profound shift, at least in the small and mid-size market.

How much of that is due to employee demand, versus an employer-driven trend? 

I think it’s half and half. I had a conversation with a business owner recently who said they couldn’t live with themselves if they weren’t providing the basics — they’d rather take changes to their own salary first. But at the same time, the conversation has changed and employees are more frank than they used to be. Some would say they’re more demanding, but they’re just being clearer about what they hope for and expect from an employer: to feel safe at work and like their income is going to be protected, and that they’ll have something for their family to fall back on if something happens to them.

So how do you help employers navigate those choices and build these plans? 

We start by looking at what we can afford in year one or year two. Employers always guess the cost of these things way too high, to the magnitude of three to five to seven to 10 times more than they’re actually going to pay. So when they’re talking about putting a disability benefit in place, which might actually cost $200 to $300 an employee, their guesses are in the $2,000 range. There’s still a fundamental gap going on when it comes to the cost of benefits. But the marketplace has gotten more efficient, and has more plan-design flexibility than it used to. And when you use that plan-design flexibility to get basic coverages in place, things like income security and protection products can get people to a place where their stress diminishes over time.

Does that get more challenging given the unpredictability of the economy right now? 

The businesses we work with are very aware of inflation, they believe a recession is coming and they’re worried. But we asked those businesses what actions they will not take in a recession, and their top choices were really interesting. They said they would not reduce salaries. And they said they would not reduce benefits offered. Historically, whether you were a large or small business, those are often the first places companies go to reduce budgets, trimming benefits or laying off staff or reducing salaries.

Reasonably, is that sustainable? 

It’s appropriate to have a little caution there, because if things continue for six months beyond where we are, nine months, 12 months, there will be a point when small and mid-size employers will have to start going after some of these things to change them. But I can tell you, it’s near the bottom of their list in terms of things they want to impact.

You’ve heard the discussion that this is sort of the strangest pseudo-recession we’ve ever seen there, and one of the reasons there isn’t as much firm agreement on some of the recessionary metrics is because wages and job growth have held up so firmly. My guess is that, at least through the summer, small businesses — which make up a good part of the GDP — were holding up some of those wages and job numbers, steady to upward.

Burnout, stress and flexible work policies have all been huge topics of discussion over the past few years. How does that all relate to financial stability, for employers and employees alike? 

For small employers, they really have — almost to their detriment — taken care of their employees. When we look at burnout compared to a year ago, employees are feeling more stress for sure, but about 40% of them would say that. When you ask employers, compared to a year ago, nearly 61% say they’re feeling more stressed. So business owners need to take care of themselves too, and make sure they’ve done the right things for business continuity.

We’ve focused so much on the structure of benefits and PTO and space to manage child care and elder care for employees, but we need to also be giving employers great advice and guidance on taking care of themselves. And beyond their personal health and wellness, the health of their business: have they revisited their business plan? Have they done the right succession planning? Do they have an informal understanding of the valuation of their business? Some small employers have given those basics up in the past year or two, but it’s another back-to-basics concept that we need to get back to.

Cal Wilson / September 28, 2022

“70% of Canadian businesses expect to do cost cutting over the next year.”

The following article was shared by Modus Research on September 26th, 2022:

In dealing with inflation, most Canadian businesses plan to cut costs

In the latest survey from The Business Monitor, released by Modus Research, Canadian executives were asked about inflation and how they plan to deal with costs.

Key findings in this release:

  • Expectations of increasing costs/inflation
  • Plans for cost cutting
  • Past versus future cost cutting

Canadian companies are bracing for inflation and increased costs of doing business

More than 8 in 10 businesses anticipate that the cost of doing business will increase over the next year.

  • Fully half (51%) say costs will increase significantly.

Despite the recent easing in the rate of inflation from the early summer, more than half of Canadian businesses think the rate of inflation will increase over the next year (undoubtedly why so many expect costs to increase significantly).

In response to inflation, fully 70% of Canadian businesses expect to do some form of cost cutting over the next year.

The biggest cuts will be to new equipment purchases, with large numbers also cutting: investing in R&D, office/workspace, recruiting and hiring new staff.

These results are consistent across all sizes of business, regionally and by industry sector.

A large increase in cost cutting is coming compared with last year

The number of companies cutting cost this year represents a significant increase over the previous year.

When asked about the costs in these same areas, businesses cut costs over the previous 12 months at much lower levels.

The most sizable shift in the number of companies cutting cost will come in the areas of employee costs, workspaces, and new equipment.

Methodology

The survey was conducted from August 19 to September 5 using the Modus Business Panel – Canada’s only purpose-built, probability based B2B research panel. Because the Panel is built using random probability telephone sampling, it is valid to cite the margin of error for this survey. The survey is based on a representative sample of 600 Canadian managers and executives and has a margin of error of +/- 4.0% pts 95 times out of 100. The survey data is weighted by size and region according to the latest Statistics Canada data to help ensure representativeness for Canadian enterprises.

Cal Wilson / September 21, 2022

Advice from Gartner: 7 Cost-Reduction Mistakes to Avoid

The following article was shared by Gartner on August 17th, 2022:

7 Cost-Reduction Mistakes to Avoid

Contributor: Jackie Wiles

Be ready with productive options when your CFO asks for cost reductions.

Many executive leaders will need to make trade-offs in their spending to tackle today’s triple squeeze of persistent inflation, supply chain disruptions and a tight labor market. But common missteps in cost reduction can undermine even structured programs designed to optimize cost decisions strategically.

“Many more CFOs will start to look for cost reductions if high inflation persists or if there is a risk that higher interest rates will weaken the demand-side of the economy,” says Randeep Rathindran, Vice President, Research, at Gartner. “Executives should scope now where to secure cost reductions while avoiding seven common mistakes that make it difficult — and potentially impossible — to pursue growth ambitions in the longer term.”

Error No. 1: Making blanket cuts with unrealistic targets

Fewer than half (43%) of leaders actually achieve the level of savings they set out to in the first year of cost reduction. Unrealistic targets are the problem.

Across-the-board cuts penalize the more efficient parts of your organization (demotivating those teams) and can result in eroding important sources of value.

Error No. 2: Failing to sustain behavior change

Only 11% of organizations can sustain cost cuts over a three-year period. This is because most cost-cutting strategies are short term and fail to preserve the behavioral change required for smart spending decisions in the future.

Although some costs (such as travel and expense) can be capped by policy rules and restrictions, many removed costs inevitably creep back in as budget owners and managers pursue spending and initiatives in the name of supporting growth. The result is another painful round of cost reductions when the next crisis hits.

Error No. 3: Slowing down the organization

Only 6% of organizations consistently invest in growth opportunities without creating excessive complexity. Because of the premium many organizations and their investors place on top-line growth, executive leaders tend to have a blindspot when it comes to complexity.

Complexity drives almost half of the growth in corporate overhead costs. From introducing too many incremental variants of existing products to investing in scope-additive business lines or elaborate management hierarchies, complexity creates:

Direct costs, such as excessive inventory holding or warranty costs from supporting too many product varieties and SKUs
Indirect costs in terms of slower decision making

Error No. 4: Choking off needed innovation

Only 9% of organizations create enough capacity to take on the growth and innovation opportunities they pursue. Aggressive cost reductions can drain resources from high-impact innovation projects or indefinitely delay funding to a point where competitors can hurdle your organization in the market.They can also promote an environment where innovators don’t feel permissioned to request enough multiyear funding required to ensure their initiatives are successful.

Error No. 5: Missing the boat on digital

Among CFOs polled in July 2022, 66% said they planned to increase investment in digital technology in the ensuing 12 months, and another 32% said they would maintain such spending. That’s the highest percentage of any spend category, reflecting the ongoing need to prioritize digital acceleration as a way to:

Permanently reduce the cost of doing business (especially to fight inflation)
Improve customer and employee experience
Outperform competitors during the looming downturn

However, realizing value and scale from IT initiatives requires an actionable digital-investment model and a clear understanding of enterprise digital strategy.  A productive CFO-CIO partnership is also critical to ensure funding continues to flow to critical digital initiatives.

Error No. 6: Rushing into unfair contracts with providers

Two in five IT leaders regret technology purchases due to unfavorable terms or overpriced fees. It is imperative for an organization to acquire the right set of technologies to support its digital transformation or speed up business processes. However, limited budgets, coupled with pressure to invest in new and disruptive technologies, can drive leaders to invest in technologies that require unforseen implementation costs, generate new inefficiencies and generally fail to meet expectations, wasting potentially millions in economic resources.

Vendor negotiations are a key part of cost optimization strategies, and today’s high levels of inflation make it even harder to tell if your vendors are tying price increases to their costs or are simply trying to maintain their margins. Make sure to negotiate not just prices but terms and conditions.

Error No. 7: Introducing harmful risks to the organization

Under budget pressure, executives typically look first to lower costs in their direct area of responsibility, such as their function, but it’s critical to consider, too, whether those cost-reduction actions would create or exacerbate risks that threaten the organization’s value proposition.

Examples:

  • Cybersecurity. Underinvesting in cybersecurity may keep IT costs low but raises the risk of a major cybersecurity incident, like a ransomware attack or a headlining breach, which would be unacceptable to shareholders, customers or partners. Managing the impact of a major cybersecurity incident is itself very costly.
  • Supply chain. Reducing inventory levels across the entire product portfolio can improve the organization’s short-term cash position but erode supply chain performance, putting customer service levels at risk for items that generate greater value for the organization.
  • Talent. Cost-cutting initiatives and deinvestment can damage employee experience, which is critical for employee engagement and productivity. Understanding that impact can help you avoid rash decisions that could damage key talent outcomes in the long term. This is especially important today, when certain talent is scarce and costly.

In short:

  • Cost reductions will likely be on the agenda in coming weeks and months as organizations navigate a range of economic headwinds.
  • Knee-jerk action to reduce costs can have unintended consequences for the longer-term health of your organization.
  • Consider now how you can reduce spending without risking digital initiatives and other growth strategies later.

This article has been updated since its original publication in December 2020 to reflect new events, conditions and research.
Randeep Rathindran, VP and Team Leader, has a primary research focus on the Chief Financial Officer and FP&A leader role, Financial Data and Analytics, Investor Relations, and Finance Technology Optimization key initiatives.

Cal Wilson / August 10, 2022

Companies Start to Lean More on Cost Savings Amid Persistent Inflation

According to the Wall Street Journal, “Companies are taking steps to cut costs and improve efficiency after many of them relied more on boosting prices in recent quarters to offset inflation and bolster their bottom lines.”

You can read more of of what they have to say, here.

Schooley Mitchell helps businesses reduce operational expenses and grow their bottom lines, keeping them strong even in the midst of economic hardships.

Cal Wilson / August 10, 2022

Solving The Need To Cut Costs In IT And Engineering Services In A Recession

According to Forbes, “Typically as we enter recessions, companies look to quickly cut costs; that translates into laying people off and cutting back on hiring. Whereas your company may do that as a whole, CIOs and CTOs should be very thoughtful before they do that in their engineering and IT organizations because there likely will be continued demand for these services. We are still in a constrained labor market, so once a company lets these people go, it will be very hard to hire them again.”

You can read more of of what they have to say, here.

Schooley Mitchell helps businesses reduce operational expenses and grow their bottom lines, keeping them strong even in the midst of economic hardships.

Cal Wilson / August 10, 2022

Companies Weigh Fresh Cuts as Operating Costs Go Up

According the Wall Street Journal, “Businesses are reducing office space, scaling back on consulting and opting for cheaper packaging of goods as they look to stay ahead of the downturn.

Although companies already were leaning more on cost savings to combat higher inflation, the threat of a recession has prompted a harder look at the finances for some firms.”

You can read more of of what they have to say, here.

 

Schooley Mitchell helps businesses reduce operational expenses and grow their bottom lines, keeping them strong even in the midst of economic hardships.